Dinner Topics for Tuesday
This is a continuation of the commentary by Rush Limbaugh on the Al Jazeera purchase of Al Gore’s network. It includes definitions, showing the difference between regular Muslims and extreme Islamists. Keep in mind that they both desire the domination of Sharia Law, but go about it differently. Sharia Law is diametrically opposed to the Constitution of the United States. We will discuss more about Sharia Law soon. This is information that should be understood by every American who values liberty. ~C.A. Davidson
Al Jazeera wouldn’t get on one cable network if they’re openly advocating terrorism to achieve their objectives. So they’re doing it under the guise of news.
If you’re part of the Muslim Brotherhood or if you are an oil sheik in the Middle East and you’re looking at ways to spread the word about what you believe in your heart of hearts, and you study the rest of the world and look at people who’ve succeeded, you would eventually find the American mainstream media. And in your study of how to effectively, peacefully — inform, indoctrinate, propagandize, whatever — get people to accept your worldview, you have to admit that studying the way the American mainstream media has done it is pretty effective
The irony is, Gore has become what he has become targeting Big Oil!
Big Oil, fossil fuel! It is the number one enemy. It is who Algore has attempted to get everybody to hate. And yet who did he just get in bed with? The important thing is what Gore is going to do for Al Jazeera going forward. Now, about Al Jazeera. To understand Al Jazeera, you have to understand the difference between “Islamist” and “Islamist” terrorist. An Islamist is not “a Muslim.” You must understand this. Terms are specific and they have meaning.
Words mean things. An Islamist is any Muslim person or institution that wants to impose Sharia law. An Islamist terrorist wants to do it via terrorism. An Islamist terrorist will accomplish the objective, or seek to, by pursuing radical objectives through terrorism. Now, Al Jazeera is not Islamist terrorist, but they are openly Islamist. They’re not who they’re not. They’re not an island in the world of Islam that’s not Islamist.
They are who they are.
Now, you may not be comfortable hearing it, you might not want to hear it, but it is what it is. Remember, I’m the mayor of Realville. The most popular show on Al Jazeera is called Sharia and Life. It is hosted by a sheik, Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi. And he happens to be the top jurist in the Muslim Brotherhood, which is now running Egypt, who, by the way, Mr. Morrissey has now gone public again with demanding back the blind sheik, Omar Abdel Rahman, who’s in jail here.
Al Jazeera is openly Islamist. Their most popular show is Sharia and Life, and it’s hosted by Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who’s the top jurist in the Muslim Brotherhood. The network, just like the Muslim Brotherhood, pretends to be opposed to terrorism. But they support Hamas; they support Hezbollah. They do it by rationalizing that these are just resistance and political organizations, not terrorist groups.
Now, I don’t want anybody to think that I have just said that every Muslim is an Islamist. They’re not. It’s why I’m making the point here. The difference here is between “Islamist” and “Islamist terrorist.” Islamists and Islamist terrorists have the same objective. They just go about it different ways. Al Jazeera wouldn’t get on one cable network if they’re openly advocating terrorism to achieve their objectives. So they’re doing it under the guise of news.
If you’re part of the Muslim Brotherhood or if you are an oil sheik in the Middle East and you’re looking at ways to spread the word about what you believe in your heart of hearts, and you study the rest of the world and look at people who’ve succeeded, you would eventually find the American mainstream media. And in your study of how to effectively, peacefully — inform, indoctrinate, propagandize, whatever — get people to accept your worldview, you have to admit that studying the way the American mainstream media has done it is pretty effective.
So Al Jazeera is what it is. That’s who Algore accepted money from, and that’s who Algore is now going to be lobbying for. And I think among all the things I’ve mentioned, the fact that Al Jazeera exists because of oil, which Algore has gotten wealthy despising and making other people despise, I just find it fascinating that nobody is calling Gore a hypocrite, that nobody is questioning whether Gore now has any credibility at all. If oil is rotten to the core, why in the world would you help them? Why would you enrich them? Why would you facilitate whatever it is they’re trying to accomplish? Big Oil is bad whether they’re making gasoline or whether they’re doing news, I would think.
I don’t know how many people that listen to the BBC World Service or watch it on TV, I don’t know how many people think it’s as leftist as it is, but clearly not a majority. It, like the mainstream media in this country, is perceived as news and objective and fair and truthful and all that.
The mainstream media, if you’re an outsider studying this country, would have to be something you really admire. You’d look at how they did it, and they’ve done it by ostensibly being in the news business. But they’re not any longer. The mainstream media is not in the news business; they’re part of the Democrat Party. But they’re so good at it that as far as the low-information voter is concerned, they’re still in the news business. They’re objective. They’re fair.
You must be logged in to post a comment.