EPICWORLD DINNER TOPICS

Liberals ignore Science Truth to advance their Agenda and Attack Liberty

The Left Relentlessly Pushes Climate Hoax in All-Out Assault on Capitalism

Rush Limbaugh

Every year for 20 years the supporters of this theory have been wrong, as wrong as it’s possible to be.  That means that the person predicting global warming is not credible and does not deserve to be listened to. Because that person hasn’t been right. That person has been as wrong as that person could be for 20 years. There isn’t any warming.

Obama, as we speak, is addressing the United Nations on something that is not happening — climate change — and he is announcing all of his support for new regulations on limiting emissions of greenhouse gases. It’s an upside down world.

Let me go through a little exercise in logic, of which we are in sad short supply. Okay?  A person predicts global warming every year for 20 years, man-made global warming due to one thing: The predicted increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.  I should precede this by pointing out that… I know for you true believers, you’re not gonna believe this.  But there is no hard evidence of global warming, period, man-made or otherwise.

 

Therefore, the debate about global warming due to increased levels of CO2 — in real terms — is over.  Except that it’s not.  Because as we speak, the president and the secretary of state are at the United Nations telling everybody of the threat of global warming because of CO2 emissions and how we, as a leading economic industrial nation, have got to cut back or else it’s end times for our planet.

Yet it isn’t.

Virtually everything… I don’t care how scientific they sound. I don’t care.  They’re wrong.  They’ve been as wrong as it’s possible to be.  But that doesn’t matter.  Do you know why?  Because the global warming advocates “care,” and those of us pointing out how they’re wrong obviously don’t care. In their view, we don’t care. So it’s not about fact.

These are the kinds of people, this is the kind of thinking that is leading this country right now, and it’s why we are so challenged.  John Kerry, who served Vietnam… I made this point yesterday, and it’s in the news again today. John Kerry had a bunch of foreign leaders at the State Department to talk about ISIS and what our upcoming action is gonna be, and he actually told them that global warming is a bigger threat to the people of this country than even is ISIS. He’s back with the news media covering it today.  This TheHill.com: “Secretary of State John Kerry,” who served in Vietnam, “said the threats posed by climate change should be addressed with as much ‘immediacy’ as confronting the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), and the Ebola outbreak. During a meeting with foreign ministers on Sunday, Kerry said global warming is creating ‘climate refugees,’” kind of like Christians running for their lives from ISIS.

There are no “climate refugees,” folks.

The LA Times. I don’t know what happened out there, but the LA Times has a story today that just totally destroys the global warming advocacy.  It’s been repeated. Actually it comes from the journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.  And this report from the journal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, says that the warming trend on the Left Coast over the last 100 years was not caused by human activity, but rather by a change in wind.

Now, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences is an approved, peer group, leftist bunch.  The LA Times repeated this. I don’t know how this got past their editors, ’cause this totally debunks a major spoke of the wheel of global warming.  This cuts out one of the legs of a three-legged stool, to say that man-made global warming is not at all responsible for the warming trend the last century in the West.

It’s wind.

“Using independent data from 1900 to 2012, researchers showed that the temperature change is ‘primarily attributed to changes in atmospheric circulation.’” That would be wind, for those of you in Rio Linda.  “This, they wrote, ‘presents a significant reinterpretation of the region’s recent climate change origins.’

“‘Surface winds and wind-driven ocean currents have large effects on temperatures in and around the northeast Pacific Ocean; they dominate the overall temperature variability and also account for a large fraction of the warming trend,’ Jim Johnstone, lead author of the study, said in a statement.”  So it’s not your SUV.  It isn’t your smokestack.  It isn’t your lightbulbs.  It’s not your stupid hair spray!  It’s not the fact that you don’t recycle.

It’s none of that.

It’s the wind!

And I’m telling you, folks, I don’t know anybody who claims to control it.  They say that George Bush steered Hurricane Katrina to New Orleans, but I have never heard anybody claim that they have control over the wind, where it blows, and how strong, and where it comes from.  Have you?  (interruption)  Okay.  So we could conclude that even the radicals have not laid claim for man being responsible for the wind.  Here comes the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.  The evidence every day piles up.

And by that, I mean, they focus on people who have, in their own estimation, meaningless lives. They’re wondering what their purpose is. Why am I here? Why am I driving this clunker car? Why can’t I get a good job? Why am I here? And then all of a sudden those people hear they can save the planet.  Now, that’s big.  You go from mattering not at all, to being a key ingredient to saving the planet, you sign up right then and you do whatever.  Then you let everybody know you’re doing it. So you go buy a Prius and you go support all this madcap, crazy stuff, and you become an evangel. You are saving the planet and your new life has meaning.  And that’s what I mean by preying on the weak, the dumb, the stupid.

How many times have you heard anybody on TV who’s being interviewed for some  achievement, for some accomplishment, for some reason, and the person, usually a Hollywood actress, but it could be anybody, “I want to make a difference.”  How many times have you heard that?  Well, that’s what they prey on.  You want to make a difference?  Fine, you can save the planet.  Now, you’ve helped destroy it.  We know you didn’t mean to, but you unwittingly by driving the car you drove or eating McDonald’s, you were destroying the planet.

But now you can atone.  You must vote Democrat, support Big Government, the welfare state, and cut back on progress.  And if you do all that, we’ll love you, we’ll take care of you. Just vote for us and you can save the planet.  That’s how they prey on ’em.  They can make a difference.  Hitler made a difference.  Stop and think about that. RUSH: Grab sound bite number one.  Remember we talked about this babe either late last week or yesterday? Naomi Klein. She’s got a new book out that admits, it literally admits that the global warming movement is totally devoted to anti-capitalism. It finally admits it.

RUSH: Grab sound bite number one.  Remember we talked about this babe either late last week or yesterday? Naomi Klein. She’s got a new book out that admits, it literally admits that the global warming movement is totally devoted to anti-capitalism. It finally admits it.

Of course the left is hailing the book.  She has written a couple of books prior to this that are also extreme left wing.  But this one they’re celebrating because apparently they like the fact that they could be honest that what they’re doing here is trying to destroy an economic system and that capitalism is responsible for all of the war.

Capitalism is responsible for all the inequality, the inequity, the unfairness, the discrimination, the divide between haves and have-nots, the divide between rich and poor. Capitalism’s the reason there are Republicans.  That alone is reason enough to do away with capitalism. Capitalism is the reason there’s a Tea Party. That’s reason alone to get rid of it.  Capitalism is the reason why there are conservatives.

We’ve got to get rid of capitalism.

KLEIN:  Planning is a dirty word (snickers) in post-Reagan America. I spent time with the climate change deniers on the right.  They have understood for a very long time that if the climate science is true, and we need to cut our emissions as much as scientists are telling us we need to — and if indeed industrial capitalism is destabilizing the life support systems that we all depend on — then their ideological project of pushing for ever so-called freer markets and vilifying collective action as quasi-socialist — which, you know, the basic talking points of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh –

If the United States had never been a capitalist country and if Naomi Klein’s preferred view of the world had happened, we wouldn’t be a superpower. There wouldn’t be any “life-support system that we all depend on.”  Under socialism, a bunch of dictators would be in charge of it, and they’d be feeding themselves and their cronies, and everybody else would be fighting for crumbs, which is the way it is in every communist or socialist country.

I’m not making it up. Look at them. You can go live in Cuba if you want. Live under the ChiComs if you want. Pick any socialist country you want, and live there. I mean, none of this is being made up.  And the scientists are just dead wrong here.  They’re all been politicized.  We just discussed this.  There hasn’t been any warming for 20 years, yet the CO2 emissions, the number one agent of it.

They have increased, by dramatic numbers.  It’s just a total… In scientific terms it’s a hoax.  For the left, it isn’t a hoax, it’s just a cause. It’s a religion to them.  You’re never gonna be able to talk ’em out.  I know some people in New York who went to the global warming march on Sunday. They told me some of the signs they’re carrying.  They tried to talk to them. You can’t talk to them.

They see capitalism “destabilizing the life support systems we all depend on”?  Where? The exact opposite is true.  Capitalism is “the life support system we all depend on.”  The problem in the world can be boiled down to one stated fact: an inefficient, unequal distribution of capitalism around the world.

OBAMA: We will do our part, and we’ll help developing nations do theirs.

RUSH:  We’re not gonna be able to if this keeps up. (sigh) We’re not gonna be able to help anybody.  We’ll be too busy helping ourselves.  Anyway, once again, the president is apologizing for and bashing his own country on the issue of global warming. “We recognize our role in creating this problem.”  Oh, yes! See, it’s all our fault.

This is supposed to gain favor with these thugs at the UN. They’re supposed to applaud and say, “Yep, yep, you guys are the problem in the world.  Exactly right.  Now give us some of your money to make up for it,” and Obama seems willing and eager to hand it over.  He also said… He ended his speech urging “global action” so that the world that we leave to our children is cleaner, healthier, and more prosperous and secure. 

How does a carbon tax do any of that?

How does a carbon tax do any of those things?

How does a carbon tax “leave a cleaner, healthier, and more prosperous and secure world to our kids”?  It impoverishes their parents! (laughing) There’s no way.  How does a carbon tax do any of that?  It does the opposite of it.  And, by the way, Obama also said, “We are the first generation to feel the effect of climate change and the last generation who can do something about it.”

Two lies in one sentence.

The Left Relentlessly Pushes Climate Hoax in All-Out Assault on Capitalism