History of Government Abuse of Power, Present: Obama and Hundreds of Deaths

Past:

Bill Clinton and Janet Reno sent scary gun goons into the house to forcibly seize Elian and send him back to Cuba immediately.

History-Clues

Truth-Detectors

Update:

Obama Has Hispanic Blood on His Hands, But Democrats Say Republicans Hate and Despise Hispanic Children

The UK Daily Mail has a story that I guarantee you will not see in American media.  Headline, and naturally it’s an exclusive:  “‘A lot of people die out here’ and ‘all this blood…is on Obama’s hands’: Shocking images show corpses of illegal immigrants left to die after border crossings.”

Here are the subheadlines.  “Rancher shares grotesque photos with MailOnline, saying Obama bears the blame for a rising death toll among illegal immigrants. Volunteer patrol network in south Texas has found 259 bodies in one county alone, maybe 20 percent of the actual body count. Border Patrol source concedes the agency has no idea how many are perishing between the border and official government checkpoints.”

Now remember what Rick Perry said, that Obama has moved the border patrol checkpoints 45 miles inland.  I don’t mean in places like San Diego and Juarez and El Paso.  Other border checkpoints, not major crossings.  The border patrol, they’re 45 miles inland.  So you cross the border and you still have 45 miles before you encounter anybody.  It’s in that sliver that dead bodies are being found.  And a rancher, for example, has documented it with photographs and shared the photographs with the Daily Mail.  They published some with the grotesque nature of the photos pixeled out. 

“Dead bodies of illegal immigrants are turning up in south Texas as Central Americans pour across the U.S.-Mexico border, and a veterinarian who ranches cattle 70 miles from ground zero has the photos to prove it.”  You can see it, go to Daily Mail online.  And on Drudge.

Why?

Rush Limbaugh

All these kids flooding our southern border and we’re being told, “We’ve got to let them in, they’re children, Rush, we’ve got to let them in.”  Why now?  I don’t think anybody’s really thinking about that, because that was then, this is now.  Now they’re on the border.  But it takes 45 days to get here.  And I just don’t believe that out of the clear blue 65,000 children decided to leave their homes in El Salvador and Guatemala and come here, Honduras.

There has to be a reason why they’re on the way here.  Somebody has to have convinced somebody down there that it’s going to be utopia when they get here. That when they get here they’re going to be able to stay. That when they get here they’re going to be readily assimilated and moved into our society.  They’re going to be fine.  Why else come?  Some would say, “Rush, you know what they’re fleeing.”  Well, yeah, but that’s not new.  The circumstances they’re fleeing are not new.  Why now?  Why, when we have Barack Obama as president, why now is this happening?

I’m telling you, folks, there’s a reason this is happening, and it’s not coincidental.  It’s not accidental.  And I think at some point we’re going to find out why this is happening.  I think we’re going to uncover proof.  We’re going to find out later on, somehow, quirk of fate, we’re going to find out what is really behind this.  Because this just doesn’t happen on its own.  And no, I’m not talking about any kind of conspiracy. It doesn’t have to be a conspiracy.  All it would take is some Spanish language ad campaign in some obscure publications in these countries, and that’s all it would take.  But it is clear the Democrat Party is not upset by this.  It is clear the Democrat Party wants this.

So we’re going to find at some point that this is not just the result of America being a great place.  And this is not the result of some kids finally getting old enough to realize what a great place this is.  You just don’t leave your family like this in these numbers.  And your parents don’t just kick you out of the house and put you on a train for 45 days or to hook you up with coyotes.

2000—Clinton Government Forces Child back to Communist Bondage

CALLER: Thanks for being a beacon of truth in a culture of deception. Hey, I have a quick solution for the children in Arizona. I was thinking why don’t we just use the 2000 Elian Gonzalez doctrine, where it was so critical for the federal government to repatriate a six-year-old boy with his family in Cuba that we used law enforcement and everything to make sure that he was extracted and returned to his home country where he belonged. That was such critical importance back then. I think we forgot about that. So why don’t we just use that doctrine to return the kids in Arizona?

RUSH: You know, that is actually very brilliant on your part.

CALLER: Oh, thank you.

RUSH: It really is. Elian Gonzalez. That’s exactly right. His mother died while he and a bunch of other people with her were en route to the United States over the ocean from Cuba.

CALLER: Right.

RUSH: His mother died and he ended up living with some relatives and his father, Juan Gonzalez, was still back in Cuba. And of course guns were pointed at him by Fidel Castro and others. And so a plea was made to return Elian Gonzalez to his father, Juan Gonzalez, who Fidel Castro said was a good worker. And the local family in Miami wanted to keep young Elian. He was six years old. They wanted to keep him. It was a great home. He was here in America. He was where his mother wanted him to be. His father and mother were split up or divorced.

The Clinton administration, Janet Reno, ended up sending an armed to the teeth federal agent into that little house in Miami, stormed it, took that kid out of there. Juan Gonzalez was flown up here from Cuba, put in a hotel paid for by the Clinton Regime. They reunited the kid, sent him back to Cuba to grow up a young little communist. You are exactly right. They moved heaven and earth to return one kid to a communist country.

CALLER: So just use that doctrine now, apply it, since that seems to be the standing way —

RUSH: Yeah, well, no, Curt asked the question, “Why doesn’t that doctrine apply here?”

CALLER: Right. That’s my question.

RUSH: Yeah.

CALLER: Why don’t we just — you know, we’re rule of law. Let’s utilize past precedent for —

RUSH: They said it was so important, you’re right, so important for a family reunification. Get the child back with his real father, not some pretend aunt and her father. Get him back to his real family. You people I’m sure remember, if you weren’t old enough to, this went on for weeks. It was a huge cause celebre. And the root of it was that the aunt and her father, a loving home, kid seemed very happy, six years old, why sent him back to a hellhole?

Janet Reno could not wait to do it. You know, she was in charge of the Waco invasion. And Bill Clinton couldn’t wait to send this kid back. We jump forward now and here we have tens of thousands of Elian Gonzalezes and there’s no even pretense of reuniting them with their families. Well, I take it back. Find the parents and bring them here is now the Elian Gonzalez doctrine.